Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Neb. 286 - State v. Hayden

State v. Hayden’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 113 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Anderson · Gibson v. City of Lincoln · State v. Hayden · Tulloch v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It should be noted that the drafters of § 29-3703 chose not to include the same specifically enumerated and detailed requirements for submitting reports to the court as are mandated by § 29-3701. . . . The statute does not specify what those “records” consist of, and it does not require that the court be furnished with any evidence prior to the hearing. Therefore, we find that the State and the district court erred in believing that the specific provisions of § 29-3701 are somehow grafted onto the phrase “the records” in § 29-3703.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.