Haines v. Taft’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DiProspero v. Penn · Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. Barow · Oswin v. Shaw · Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. · Roig v. Kelsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[L]egislative intent controls because "statutes are to be read sensibly rather than literally and the controlling legislative intent is to be presumed as consonant to reason and good discretion." When "discerning that [legislative] intent we consider not only the particular statute in question, but also the entire legislative scheme of which it is a part." [ Haines v. Taft , 237 N.J. 271 , 283, 204 A.3d 263 2019 WL 1339479 (2019) (second alteration in original) (citations omitted).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“discerning that [legislative] intent we consider not only the particular statute in question, but also the entire legislative scheme of which it is a part.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.