Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 NJSUPER 511 - State v. Rose

State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Choice · State v. Talley · 218 N.J. Super. 487 - State v. Vasky · 198 N.J. Super. 219 - State v. Clarke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]y virtue of the `consolidation' provision of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-2(a), a defendant charged with robbery is now on notice that any conduct denominated as theft is within the four corners of a robbery indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a. Movable property. A person is guilty of theft if he unlawfully takes, or exercises unlawful control over, movable property of another with purpose to deprive him thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.