In Re SRBA’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Owen v. City of Independence · State v. Hedger · Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co. · Michalk v. Michalk · Nelson v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In re SRBA , 149 Idaho 532 , 536-37, 237 P.3d 1 , 5-6 (2010) (citing I.C. § 42-1422 ). Subcases referred to a special master are governed by the Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure (I.R.C.P.), the Idaho Rules of Evidence (I.R.E.); Idaho Code § 42-1411 (5) ; and SRBA Administrative Order 1 (AO1). See AO1 §§ 9(b), (11)(d); see also In re SRBA Case, No. 39576 , 128 Idaho 246 , 265-66, 912 P.2d 614 , 633-34 (1995).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The special master's findings which the court adopts are considered to be the findings of the court. I.R.C.P. 52(a) ; ... The special master's conclusions of law are not binding upon the district court, although they are expected to be persuasive. ... To the degree that the district court adopts the special master's conclusions of law, they are also the conclusions of the court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The district court may appoint a special master in any general adjudication and shall specify the special master's powers and duties in the order of reference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.