Smart v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · McKart v. United States · Eidelson v. Archer · Hymes v. DeRamus · State, Department of Revenue v. Andrade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The City has an ordinance specifically providing for an independent Board of Appeals to review disputed decisions or orders of the City building official. See CBJ Ordinance 19.02.010.... Since an administrative appeal is clearly provided for, exhaustion of remedies is required in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]s we have noted, the purpose of an administrative review process is to allow an agency 'to correct its own errors so as to moot judicial controversies.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Although the definition of 'regulation' is broad, it does not encompass every routine, predictable interpretation of a statute by an agency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.