State v. Vars’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
August 2023
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · State v. Brown · 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · State v. Adel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of indecent exposure if he or she intentionally makes any open and obscene exposure of his or her person or the person of another knowing that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable affront or alarm. The act of breastfeeding or expressing breast milk is not indecent exposure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'a lascivious exhibition of those private parts of the person which instinctive modesty, human decency, or common propriety require shall be customarily kept covered in the presence of others.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he issue is whether sufficient circumstantial evidence exists to prove that Vars intentionally exposed himself in the presence of another and in a manner likely to cause affront or alarm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.