Pniewski v. Kunda’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1995
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anstine v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Ason v. Leonhart · Groh v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Bitting v. Wolfe · 209 Pa. Super. 126 - May v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a jury reaches an ambiguous or improper verdict, one proper remedy is to permit them to correct the mistake or ambiguity, Ason v. Leonhart, 402 Pa. 312 , 165 A.2d 625 (1960); Anstine v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 342 Pa. 423 , 20 A.2d 774 (1941). Pniewski v. Kunda, 237 Pa.Superior Ct. 438, 352 A.2d 462 (1975).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.