237 So. 3d 21 - Feingerts v. D'Anna’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 591 So. 2d 342 - Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs · Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. · 481 So. 2d 567 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Bosworth · 974 So. 2d 1266 - Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. · 961 So. 2d 1228 - Wooley v. Lucksinger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether or not that assertion is labeled a promise or a legal opinion is inconsequential.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The claimant's subjective belief does not establish an attorney-client relationship unless the lawyer reasonably induced that belief. Some courts, however, have said that the standard is the claimant's subjective belief, but such remarks usually have been qualified by explaining that the belief was "reasonable." That, of course, is an objective standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.