237 So. 3d 889 - Carson v. Carson (Ex parte Carson)’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc. · 893 So. 2d 1116 - Ex Parte Fidelity Bank · Ex Parte Rawls · 963 So. 2d 604 - Ex Parte Brown · Southern Health Systems, Inc. v. Antonucci
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court also observed in Watkins that '[t]he question of whether to transfer a case because of venue addresses itself to the sound discretion of the trial court, and any abuse of that discretion may be controlled by the writ of mandamus.' [ 555 So.2d at 1099 ].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Venue, in a divorce action, lies in the county where the parties resided at the time of the separation, not in the county where the separation occurred. Norton v. Norton , 48 Ala.App. 663 , 267 So.2d 457 (Ala. Civ. App. 1972).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.