Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1939
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. Strycharski · Hume v. Schintz · 55 Tex. Civ. App. 504 - Hubbart v. Willis State Bank · Carwile v. Wm. M. Cameron & Co. · Lloyd v. Brinck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To reverse this case and render a judgment on the second verdict would effectually cut off any right-which the opposing party might have on appeal to question the correctness of that verdict, or its sufficiency as compensation for the damages claimed. No appeal ban be prosecuted from a judgment that has not been entered of record. Daniel v. Daniel, 128 S. W. 470 ; Cyrus v. Hicks, 20 Tex. 483 ; Hubhart v. Willis State Bank, 55 Tex. Civ. App. 504 , 119 S. W. 711 . For the same, if not a stronger, reason no appeal can be prosecuted from a verdict upon which the trial court has rendered no judgment. We cannot thus destroy the right of appeal from that verdict.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.