Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 SW3D 128 - Rankins v. Commonwealth

Rankins v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · State v. . Webb · Heard v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neither Crawford nor Davis limited testimonial statements to those obtained by law enforcement or their agents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether it is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecutions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.