¶1concurs in the judgment with only a note: “A portion of the majority’s discussion is inconsistent with a prior holding of this Court. See Joubert v. State, 129 S.W.3d 686 (Tex.App.-Waco 2004, no pet.). Application of JoubeH to the facts presented in this appeal would result in the same judgment.”
237 S.W.3d 390
Johnson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided November 6, 2007
This page is marked noindex.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · decided 2007-11-06
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2013
1 state decisions
Relies on Joubert v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-11-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →