Mason v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 40th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. State · 126 S. Ct. 2916 - Credit Suisse First Boston Ltd. v. Billing · Marin v. State · Wyatt v. State · Saldano v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In every criminal case, a defendant is presumed to be innocent. That doesn't mean they are innocent. What it means is the presumption of innocence standing alone is sufficient to acquit a defendant unless the prosecution meets its burden of proof and proves the defendant guilty by the standard provided by law. That's what presumption of innocence means. It's another way of saying nobody has to prove they're not guilty. That's the one clich[e] you hear around and I think it's going to apply, or certainly apply, in criminal trials in the State of Texas is that you[] are innocent until proven guilty. So the presumption of innocence means that you are innocent until proven guilty unless there's sufficient evidence to convince you beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant is guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Johnson v. State“require to reach th[e] level of confidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.