Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 U.S. 605 - Lumber Underwriters v. Rife

Lumber Underwriters v. Rife’s Empirical Analysis

237 U.S. 605 · 1915

Citation profile

220
cited by 220 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
December 1972
most recently cited

151 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 220 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1972 · most notably Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty. (1931), American Fire Insurance v. King Lumber & Manufacturing Co. (1919)

151 federal appellate · 4 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 15 states

8801915192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedRife v. Lumber Underwriters (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Northern Assurance Company of London v. Grand View Building Association · Insurance Company v. Norton · Grigsby v. Russell · Phænix Life Insurance v. Raddin · Aetna Life Insurance v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 220 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a policy of insurance is issued, the import of the transaction, as every one understands, is that the document embodies the contract. It is the dominant, as it purports to be the only and entire, expression of' the parties’ intent. * * * No rational theory of contract can be made that does not hold the assured to know the contents of the instrument to which he seeks to hold the other party. * * * Of course, if the insured can prove that he made a different contract from that expressed in the writing, he may have it reformed in equity. What he cannot do is to take a policy without reading it, and then, when he comes to sue at law upon the instrument, ask to have it enforced otherwise than according to its terms.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.