Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Va. 303 - Hoke v. Commonwealth

Hoke v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Travaglia v. Pennsylvania (1989), Riner v. Com. (2004)

6 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

4101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw · Edmonds v. Virginia · Smith v. Commonwealth · Stamper v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “separate and apart from, and not merely incidental to, the restraint employed in the commission of the other crime[s]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the present case, Stell’s wrists and ankles were bound securely with ligatures, her mouth was gagged tightly, and she was detained for a lengthy period. Applying the Brown rule to these facts, we conclude that Stell’s detention was greater than ‘the kind of restraint that is inherent in the act of rape,’ or in the commission of robbery. Thus, we hold that the evidence supports the jury’s finding that Hoke killed Stell in the commission of abduction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman in that it involved torture or depravity of mind or aggravated battery to the victim,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.