Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 237 Wis. 41 - Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Steffes

Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Steffes’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
6
states following
November 1966
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Tigner v. Texas · Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co. · Central Lumber Company v. State of South Dakota

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(5) Wilfully and knowingly advertising, offering for sale or selling any commodity at less than the price stipulated in any contract referred to in subsection (3), whether or not the person so advertising, offering for sale or selling is a _party to such contract, is unfair competition and is actionable at the suit of any person damaged thereby.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.