State v. Winsett’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1985
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Townsend v. Sain · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judgment must be based on the ‘totality of the circumstances.’ Blackburn v. State of Alabama, 361 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 274 , 4 L.Ed.2d 242 (1960). Factors which bear on these circumstances include the following: defendant’s age and mental condition (whether he was ‘dull,’ for example), whether he was denied a hearing before a magistrate, whether he was advised of his right to remain silent or his right to counsel, whether he was held incommunicado and if so how long, whether he was denied food for long periods, whether there were any threats of mob violence, the legality of his arrest, Payne v. State of Arkansas, supra, [ 356 U.S. 560 , 78 S.Ct. 844 , 2 L.Ed.2d 975 ]; defendant’s educational background and experience, his emotional stability or lack thereof, his record as to former crimes, whether the police used subterfuge in obtaining the statement, whether the statement was composed by a police officer, whether defendant had the aid of counsel or relatives or friends, whether there was prolonged police questioning of defendant. Ann.: Admissibility of Confession, 4 L.Ed.2d 1833 .” 238 A.2d at 824-25 . (Footnote omitted)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rooks · State v. Oakes““The use of reasonable force in effecting an arrest does not in itself impair the voluntariness of a statement made by a defendant during his subjugation or thereby render such statement inadmissible ; and “The use of such force does not necessarily taint an incriminating statement thereafter given to the police.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Winsett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.