State v. Bliss’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1985
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions — followed in 14 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Escobedo v. Illinois · Schmerber v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““After having been told that he need not take any tests, he nevertheless performed them upon request without offering any objection; in short, he consented and thereby waived his privilege.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stevens“. . . (1) we do not believe the Miranda rule applies to this case . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clay v. Riddle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.