Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Ala. 414 - Moore v. Cruit

Moore v. Cruit’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
June 1973
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 1973 · most notably Johnson v. Battles (1951), Hamilton v. Browning (1952)

33 state decisions

17019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Cox · Crescent Motor Co. v. Stone · Creel v. State. · Alabama Power Co. v. McIntosh · Ruffin Coal & Transfer Co. v. Rich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court in the oral charge gave the definition of proximate cause, and if plaintiff’s given charge 10 was faulty for failure to exclude any negligence on plaintiff’s part, we think the omission here is misleading only, — a matter readily remedied by explanatory charge requested by defendant. Alabama Power Co. v. McIntosh, 219 Ala. 546 , 122 So. 677 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Nor is it essential for plaintiff's recovery that negligence of defendant's driver be shown as the sole proximate cause of his injuries. It is sufficient that his negligence, concurring with one or more efficient causes, other than plaintiff's fault, is the proximate cause. Chambers v. Cox, 222 Ala. 1 , 130 So. 416 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It has long been the rule that an assignment of error not insisted upon in original brief is waived, and not to be renewed by being urged in a supplemental brief subsequent to submission of the cause on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.