Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Ala. 551 - Downing v. Williams

Downing v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2007

14 state decisions

6019391940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christie v. Durden · Harton v. Belcher · Rushton v. McKee & Co. · Jordan v. Order of Railway Conductors of America · Conner & Wife v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`a specific tract [of land] is unique and impossible of duplication by the use of any amount of money'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.