In Re Featherston’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 20 U.S.C. § 1091A · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. Darby · Hornsby · Dolph v. Pennsylvania Higher Education, Assistance Agency (In Re Dolph) · In Re Mammel · Foreman v. Higher Education Assistance Foundation (In Re Foreman)
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.