Doty v. Mucci’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 district · 606 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 611 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Gupta v. New Britain General Hospital (1996), Hertz Corp. v. Federal Insurance (1998)
4 district · 606 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp. · Miller v. United Technologies Corp. · Burns v. Hartford Hospital · D.H.R. Construction Co. v. Donnelly · Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 611 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Summary judgment may be granted where the claim is barred by the statute of limitations.”
200 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he party opposing summary judgment must substantiate its adverse claim by showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact together with the evidence disclosing the existence of such an issue.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage“No action . . . for injury to the person . . . caused by negligence . . . shall be brought but within two years from the date when the injury is first sustained . . .”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.