Arnold v. Horrigan’s Empirical Analysis
238 F. 39 · 1916
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 1919
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Acme Harvester Company v. Beekman Lumber Company · Everett v. Judson · Lincoln v. Claflin · Eddy v. Lafayette · District of Columbia v. Leigh Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Undoubtedly the rule, in cases of tort, is to leave the question of interest as damages to the discretion of the jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.