Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 F.2d 186 - Mitchell v. Raines

Mitchell v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis

238 F.2d 186 · 1956

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited

74 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005 · most notably Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & Associates (1959), United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co. (1980)

74 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

590195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203

Relies on United States v. Darby · Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. · Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co. · D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If he did not know, it was because he did not look, or looking, did not see, or want to see what was so plainly there.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “were regularly used in the transmission of United States postal matter and for the transportation of goods to and from points in Georgia and other states [positively established] [t]heir character as direct instrumentalities of interstate commerce * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.