Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

238 F.2d 270

Docket No. 13137.

Estelle Pearce v. John J. Gusek

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 30, 1956. Decided Nov. 15, 1956.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-11-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1956

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Monrote v. Britton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1956-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Joseph D. Bulman, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Samuel Z. Goldman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Sidney M. Goldstein and Arthur S. Feld, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for appellant.

Mr. Albert F. Beasley, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and DANAHER and BURGER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

An automobile operated by defendant collided with the plaintiff, a pedestrian. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant, based upon a jury's verdict, in an action for personal injuries. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

¶2

Affirmed.

¶3

BURGER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

/238/f2d/270 · .json · Public domain