Ehrlich v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
238 F.2d 481 · 1956
Citation profile
80 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably United States v. McGlamory (1971), United States v. Park (1976)
80 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1012 · 42 U.S.C. § 1524
Relies on Pinkerton v. United States · Dunn v. United States · United States v. Gilliland · Berra v. United States · United States v. Beacon Brass Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A defendant cannot complain merely because the charge against him is brought under the statute carrying the more serious penalties when two statutes punish the same general acts.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“will be received for the purpose of showing knowledge, intent, motive, design or scheme where such element is an essential of the commission of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.