Blankenship v. Rowntree’s Empirical Analysis
238 F.2d 500 · 1956
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 1990
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chisholm v. House · Robberson Steel Co. v. Harrell · City of Chickasha v. Hollingsworth · Ottinger v. United States · Harden v. Harden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To permit plaintiff now to recover interest for the period intermediate [to] the rendition of the first judgment and reversal of such judgment on appeal would allow him to profit by an error on his part which brought about the delay, and that would be inequitable and unjust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.