Lawlor v. National Screen Service Co.’s Empirical Analysis
238 F.2d 59 · 1956
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1976 · most notably Joseph E. Seagram and Sons, Inc., and the House of Seagram, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd., Barton Distilling Company v. Hawaiian Oke and Liquors, Ltd. (1969), Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated) (1976)
18 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.