Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 F.2d 766 - Cleaver v. United States

Cleaver v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

238 F.2d 766 · 1956

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
9
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably United States v. Borelli (1964), United States v. Agueci (1962)

55 federal appellate · 3 district · 12 state decisions

37019561960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2115 · 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Dennis v. United States · Bollenbach v. United States · Logan v. United States · United States v. Dennis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Where evidence is admissible as to one of several defendants it generally must be received and then it becomes the duty of the others to submit instructions limiting its effect. Dauer v. United States, 10 Cir., 189 F.2d 343 . In the instant case no such instruction was given nor was it requested and it has been held that it is incumbent upon the parties to request such instruction and a failure so to do precludes review of the question. Troutman v. United States, 10 Cir., 100 F.2d 628 .” * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * the termination of the conspiracy need not coincide with the completion of the crime nor even with the arrest of a conspirator. Ferris v. United States, 9 Cir., 40 F.2d 837 . The time when a continuing conspiracy terminates depends upon the particular facts and purposes of such conspiracy. Completion of the object of the conspiracy completes the conspiracy. This varies with different offenses but a conspiracy to commit a crime of stealth for material gain usually has a minimum routine development from plan to commission to division of fruits, if any, among the conspirators. * * * ” 238 F.2d 769 . [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[m]ere knowledge, approval of or acquiescence in the object or the purpose of the conspiracy, without an intention and agreement to cooperate in the crime' is not sufficient to make one a conspirator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.