Scribner & Miller v. Conway’s Empirical Analysis
238 F.2d 905 · 1956
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 1981
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co. · Finn v. Childs Co. · Conway v. Silesian-American Corp. · Conway v. Union Bank of Switzerland · In re Consolidated Motor Parts, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Finn v. Childs Co., supra, 2 Cir., 181 F.2d 431 , we held under the circumstances there disclosed that the recommendation for allowances of the S. E. C., made by this responsible and disinterested public agency after close familiarity with the entire proceedings and careful study and report, should be followed unless the reorganization judge showed reasons otherwise based on specific findings. See also In re Solar Mfg. Corp., 3 Cir., 215 F.2d 555 . * * *”. (at page 907.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.