Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 F.2d 925 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

238 F.2d 925 · 1956

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1976
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1976 · most notably Smith v. United States (1959), Edwards v. United States (1958)

34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

170195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 12 · 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act of 1993) · 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3432 · 28 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Von Moltke v. Gillies · Townsend v. Burke · Bain Jr · Albrecht v. United States · Uveges v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Further, while we are not convinced that the last sentence in the opinion, which counsel refer to as ‘the remanding order of the court’, needs clarifying, in deference to their view that it does, the last paragraph of the opinion is amended to read: “ ‘The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to sot aside the conviction and sentence and to proceed further and not inconsistently herewith, including, if the district judge is of the opinion that the ends of justice require it, permitting the defendant to withdraw his waiver of counsel and his plea of guilty and to stand trial.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.