Snow v. Ault’s Empirical Analysis
238 F.3d 1033 · 2001
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · Bates v. United States · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Harris v. Hutchinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall run from ... the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A l-year period of limitation shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court. The limitations period shall run from the latest of - (A) the date on which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Unlike 2244(d)(1)(A), which uses the phrase 'became final by . . . expiration of the time for seeking [direct] . . . review,' a phrase that . . . takes into account certiorari proceedings, 2244(d)(2) contains no such language.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.