¶1 Stanley M. Ballenger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) without prejudice, denying Ballenger’s motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel as moot, and deeming this case a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ballenger v. Norton, No. 6:06-3349-RBH, 2007 WL 1462186 (D.S.C. May 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.