Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

238 F. App'x 992

Brown v. Seranno

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-09-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2016

1 district ·

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2007-09-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Lloyd Eugene Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Seranno, No. 2:05-cv-03342-RBH (D.S.C. filed Nov. 30, 2006 & entered Dec. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/238/fappx/992 · .json · Public domain