238 F. Supp. 937 - Tyson v. Cazes’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Monroe v. Pape · Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority · Shelley v. Kraemer · Civil Rights Cases · Collins v. Hardyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) There is a restaurant, cafeteria, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises; and (b) This food selling facility is located within the premises of the bowling alley; and (c) The bowling alley holds itself out as serving patrons of the food selling facility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.