Tiller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Cawthon v. State · Creamer v. State · Strong v. State · Strozier v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is clear . . . that Miranda protects only testimonial evidence [cit.], and not non-compulsive physical evidence [cit.]. Since [the appellant] could not have refused to provide the hair samples, the absence of his attorney could not have been prejudicial. [Cits.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bowman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.