Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Ga. App. 325 - Hart v. State

238 Ga. App. 325 - Hart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Matthews v. State · Garland v. State · Sterling v. State · Caldwell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sufficient to inform the jury of the essential elements of the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Thhe trial court was not required to make factual findings on the record in support of its decision that the jurors should not be excused for cause. Factual findings are required only where the record shows on its face circumstances indicating that a potential juror has a compelling interest or bias in the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.