Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Ga. App. 818 - Key v. Grant

238 Ga. App. 818 - Key v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Union Pacific Railroad · Gust v. Jones · 198 Ga. App. 49 - Rolleston v. Huite · Meller v. Heil Co. · 202 Ga. App. 255 - Cechman v. Travis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion is generally the only basis for overruling a trial court’s judgment as to evidence’s relevancy. [Cit.] The existence of such an abuse may be measured by weighing the challenged evidence’s probative value against the risk that its admission misled the jury or created a substantial danger of unfair prejudice or confusion. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.