Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 ILL 38 - McCarthy v. Crawford

McCarthy v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
9
states following
March 1945
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1945 · most notably Boice v. Finance & Guaranty Corp. (1920), Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San Antonio (1938)

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

10019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNeil v. . the Tenth National Bank · Johnston v. Laflin · Selden White v. The Vermont and Massachusetts Railroad Company · Butters v. Haughwout · Otis v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law has been generally established that as between the parties the transfer of stock by delivery of the certificate, with power of attorney or endorsed in blank, passes title without transfer on the books of the company, even when the by-laws of the company provide to the contrary. (Authorities). Such blank transfer on the back of the certificate, to which the holder has affixed his name, is a good assignment and the party to whom it is delivered is authorized to fill it up.- It may be filled up with the name of a remote transferee, and the name to be inserted concerns only the purchaser. (Authorities).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.