238 Ill. App. 3d 475 - Monreal v. Sciortino’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably In Re Bates (2001), Loop Mortgage Corp. v. Williams (1998)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 16 Ill. App. 3d 385 - In Re Application of County Treasurer · 9 Ill. 2d 382 - Franzen v. Donichy · 101 Ill. App. 3d 132 - Admiral Builders Corp. v. Robert Hall Village · 65 Ill. 2d 183 - O'LAUGHLIN v. City of Chicago · 7 Ill. 2d 192 - People v. Hess
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of a holder of a tax certificate to receive a deed is subservient to the right of a person interested in the property to redeem. (DuPage County Collector, 98 Ill.App.3d at 952, 54 Ill.Dec. 301 , 424 N.E.2d 1204 .) “The mere failure of the tax certificate holder to get a deed does not injure him, since the purchaser recovers the amount paid for the certificate from the court after the redemption.” (DuPage County Collector, 98 Ill.App.3d at 952, 54 Ill.Dec. 301 , 424 N.E.2d 1204 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Bates“Judgments by default have the same validity and force as those rendered upon a trial of the issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“need only have an undefined interest in the real estate,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.