238 Ill. App. 3d 721 - Martin v. Cajda’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably 316 Ill. App. 3d 443 - Physicians Insurance Exchange v. Jennings (2000), In re C.S. (1998)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 85 Ill. 2d 253 - Sears v. Sears · 73 Ill. 2d 259 - Ahlers v. Sears, Roebuck Co. · 96 Ill. 2d 245 - Wilkey v. Illinois Racing Board · Altschuler v. Altschuler · 47 Ill. App. 3d 671 - Johnson v. Coleman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[Completely dispositive of the issue before this court is the requirement that] "[t]o vest the appellate court with jurisdiction[,] a party must file a notice of appeal within 30 days after entry of [the] judgment appealed from.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Jenkins · In re C.S.“"The notions of the court and the parties as to the finality of an order will not render a final order nonfinal. [Citations.] Nor will a trial court's misapprehension of the law allow an appellant to file his notice of appeal more than 30 days after the trial court issues what actually constitutes a final order."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘[I]f, upon remandment, the trial court has only to enter a judgment or decree in accordance with the directions of the reviewing court, or to conduct further proceedings on uncontroverted incidental matters, then, irrespective of the remanding clause in the judgment order, the judgment of the Appellate Court is final and reviewable.’ ” Wilkey, 96 Ill. 2d at 249 , quoting Cory Corp. v. Fitzgerald, 403 Ill. 409, 414 , 86 N.E.2d 363 (1949).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.