State v. Brueninger’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1999
most recently cited
2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Freeman · State v. Calderon · 3 Kan. App. 2d 726 - In Re Berkowitz · State v. Mahlandt · State v. Mourning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““extensively reviewed the law of double jeopardy under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and its historical background. The court then related this background to the law of double jeopardy as it currently exists in Kansas. Critical to this analysis was the court’s determination that K.S.A. 21-3108(2)(a) incorporates two key concepts — the compulsory joinder rule and the identity of elements rule. The Court of Appeals noted that these rules are both embodied in one subsection with two clauses separated by a semicolon. 3 Kan. App. 2d at 741 .” 238 Kan. at 432 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.