Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Kan. 478 - State v. Haines

State v. Haines’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Van Cleave (1986), State v. Hamilton (1987)

41 state decisions

2701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Yost · State v. Owens & Carlisle · State v. Reeves · State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An appeal to the appellate court having jurisdiction of the appeal may be taken by the defendant as a matter of right from any judgment against said defendant in the district court and upon appeal any decision of the district court or intermediate order made in the progress of the case may be reviewed, except that no appeal shall be taken by the defendant from a judgment of conviction before a district judge or associate district judge upon a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, except that jurisdictional or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings may be raised by the defendant as provided in K.S.A. 60-1507.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that a clear, unambiguous, constitutional statute is not subject to judicial construction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the sentence was the result of partiality, prejudice or corrupt motive or that it is outside the statutory limits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.