State v. Schilling’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2003
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Carpenter v. United States · State v. Nirschl · State v. Pink · State v. Braun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[B]efore disclosure will be ordered, it is incumbent upon a defendant to show that the identity of the informer is material to his defense. [Citations omitted.] It is also the rule that speculation and suspicion regarding what an informant might possibly testify to is not sufficient to require disclosure." 238 Kan. at 599-600 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is relevant and helpful to the defense of an accused, or is essential to a fair determination of a cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Washington“Dismissal is the most drastic sanction which can be applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.