Tice v. Ebeling’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The plaintiff s counsel did not object to the court’s ruling. As a general rule, anything which savors of acquiescence in a judgment cuts off the right of appellate review. [Citations omitted.] The gist of acquiescence sufficient to cut off a right to appeal is voluntary compliance with the judgment. McDaniel v. Jones, 235 Kan. 93, 102 , 679 P.2d 682 (1984). "... Appellate review is not available where there has been acquiescence' and a failure to object to actions at trial.” (Emphasis added.) Tice, 238 Kan. at 713 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Harsch v. Miller

2. ““When a verdict is attacked on the ground it is contrary to the evidence, it is not the function of this court on appeal to weigh the evidence or pass on the credibility of the witnesses. If the evidence with all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom, when considered in a light most favorable to the successful party below, will support the verdict this court should not intervene. Toumberlin v. Haas, 236 Kan. 138 , Syl. ¶ 5, 689 P.2d 808 (1984).” 238 Kan. at 708 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Smith v. United Technologies, Essex Group, Inc.