Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Md. 140 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 1981
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1981

3 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

160196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fahy v. Connecticut · Mefford and Blackburn v. State · McChan v. State · Bradbury v. State · Lauder v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““With reference to the claim that he did not have counsel at his preliminary hearing in Municipal Court, it is not alleged or shown that he entered any plea there, or that any plea or statement he may have made there was introduced at his trial in the Criminal Court, and thus the preliminary hearing was not such a critical stage of the proceedings as to require the presence of counsel. ... As to alleged lack of counsel at his arraignment, the record shows that court appointed counsel entered pleas of not guilty on his behalf at the arraignment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"To state that a confession must be 'corroborated’ is misleading. What we have consistently held is that an extrajudicial confession of guilt by a person accused of crime, unsupported by other evidence, is insufficient to warrant a conviction, but that if there is evidence, independent of the confession, which relates to and tends to establish the corpus delicti, the conviction is justified.” (Emphasis added) (Citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.