Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

238 Md. 628

Ewell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 1965

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1965-05-06

Decided 1965-05-06

Per Curiam.

¶1Court-appointed counsel has made an earnest and sincere effort to be of assistance to the appellant; but the facts render the appeal hopeless from appellant’s side thereof.

¶2He was convicted of breaking and entering and larceny. The only question presented is whether he was convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of accomplices. If we assume, without deciding, that the witness McGowan was an accomplice, there was ample corroborative testimony to support appellant’s conviction. The witness Finklestein definitely was not an accomplice, and his testimony, together with that of the other witnesses adduced by the State, was sufficient to support the conviction.

¶3Judgment and sentence affirmed.

/238/md/628 · .json · Public domain