Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 Miss. 449 - Pass v. Pass

Pass v. Pass’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 550 So. 2d 986 - Ex Parte Bayliss (1989), 547 So. 2d 766 - Nichols v. Tedder (1989)

1 federal appellate · 93 state decisions

320196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyett v. Boyett · 55 Cal. App. 2d 879 - Hale v. Hale · Malone v. Malone · 35 Wash. 2d 122 - Golay v. Golay · Cohen v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Emancipation, as employed in the law of parent and child, means the freeing of a child for all the period of its minority from the care, custody, control, and service of its parents; the relinquishment of parental control, conferring on the child the right to its own earnings and terminating the parent's legal obligation to support it.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a divorce shall be decreed from the bonds of matrimony, the court may, in its discretion, having regard to the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case, as may seem equitable and just, make all orders touching the care, custody and maintenance of the children of the marriage ... and make from time to time such new decrees as the case may require. However, where proof shows that both parents have separate incomes or estates, the court may require that each parent contribute to the support and maintenance of the children of the marriage in proportion to the relative financial ability of each.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “having regard to the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case, as may seem equitable and just, make all orders touching the care, custody and maintenance of the children of the marriage, and also touching the maintenance and alimony of the wife, or any allowance to be made to her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.