Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 238 MO 524 - Jones v. Belshe

Jones v. Belshe’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 1936
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1936

8 state decisions

50191119201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McClure v. Lewis · Cutler v. Zollinger · McKissock v. Groom · Ennis v. Burnham · Pennington v. Stanton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A contract, therefore, by one of impaired mental and will power with one standing in confidential relations with him should be closely scrutinized to See that no improper advantage has been taken or undue influence exerted. The exertion of undue influence in such ease may be pronounced from the nature of the contract, and from an unfair and unreasonable advantage secured by it.” [Jones v. Belshe, supra, 1. c. 540.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.