State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably State v. Cornell (1994), State v. Wilson (1997)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Brewer v. Williams · Argersinger v. Hamlin · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Michigan v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. “Operate” shall mean the actual physical handing [sic] of the controls of a motor vehicle. 2. “Alcoholic liquor” shall mean and include alcohol, spirits, wine and beer capable of being consumed as a beverage by a human being. 3. “Actual physical control of a motor vehicle” means one present in a motor vehicle directing influence, dominion or regulation thereof. 4. “A person is under the influence of alcoholic liquor” within the meaning of the law making it unlawful to operate a motor vehicle or be in the actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor, if he has consumed intoxicating liquor to such an extent as to have lost to an appreciable degree the normal control of his body or mental faculties and to the extent there is an impairment of the capacity to think and act correctly and efficiently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Green must accept the consequences of his election to proceed pro se. It is not up to the trial court to conduct the defense of a pro se defendant. A defendant’s [right of self-representation as] guaranteed under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S. Ct. 2525 , 45 L. Ed. 2d 562 (1975), must be honored, even if in doing so, a court allows a defendant to do harm to himself or herself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Green““ ‘ “On a claim of insufficiency of evidence, the Supreme Court will not set aside a guilty verdict in a criminal case where such verdict is supported by relevant evidence. Only where evidence lacks sufficient probative force as a matter of law may the Supreme Court set aside a guilty verdict as unsupported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.” ’ [Citation omitted.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.